L’ombre de Faux Semblant : fiction, tromperie, et vérité dans la poésie allégorique après le Roman de la Rose (France, Angleterre, et Italie)
Abstract
The question of the epistemological status of
poetic language is a central concern in the Roman de la
Rose. The Rose itself is in fact conceived as an extended
reflection on the ability of poetry to convey philosophical
and transcendent truths. While Jean de Meun invokes this
possibility, his poem finally foregrounds the fictional and
fabricated nature of his own poetic vision, and highlights
the poet’s role as an producer of counterfeit truths. This
role is explored in particular through the character of
Faux Semblant, who acts as an embodiment of the liarparadox,
and becomes an emblem for the elusive and paradoxical
poetics of truth/deception that sustain the Roman
de la Rose in its entirety. This exploration of the intrinsic
deceptiveness of poetic art and the problematic role
of the poet, crystallises in a series of recurrent motifs
and concerns that haunt late medieval vernacular poetry
more broadly, especially in France, Britain, and Italy.
While the Franco-English tradition largely reproduces
Jean de Meun’s own scepticism concerning the veridical
status of poetic speech, the Italian tradition, especially in
the Fiore and in Dante’s work, systematically seeks to
suppress such scepticism, countering it with a stronger,
more ambitious authorial model of the poet as vates.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
All products on this site are released with a Creative Commons license (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5 IT) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/it/ With this license, Authors retain copyright and publishing rights without restrictions, but allow any user to share, copy, distribute, transmit, adapt and make commercial use of the work without needing to provide additional permission, provided appropriate attribution is made to the original author or source. By using this license, all Philosophical Readings’s articles meet all funder and institutional requirements for being considered Open Access. Philosophical Readings does not charge an article processing or submission fee.