Concept predications and hierarchies in Aristotelian Organon: A philosophical ontology presented in terms of a software ontology
Abstract
Based on the two distinct Aristotelian fundamental predications, namely the essential predication being said of a subject and the accidental predication is in/ existing in a subject, I attempt to shed light on the several types of predication relations met in the Aristotelian Organon and to construct an overall conceptual map including the various relations mentioned in the Aristotelian text. This scheme includes [1] the implicit category tree of classified concepts in terms of genera and species, where a subject-member of a lower class conveys the feature-member of an upper class, as the lower class is a subset of the upper class, [2] ideas predicated of ideas, where the predicate-idea is contained as a feature in the subject-idea. The ideal software environment for the representation of hierarchical trees and custom-defined relationships is the Protégé OWL (Ontology Web Language) equipped with powerful visual tools for the display and extraction of the entire or partial diagrams.
ReferencesAckrill, J.L., (1971 [1957]) “Plato and the Copula: Sophist 251–59”, Journal of Hellenic Studies 77 (1):1-6 in: Plato. Modern Studies in Philosophy, Vlastos G. (eds), Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-86203-0_12 , pp.211-221
Cohen, Marc, Predication and Ontology: The Categories,
https://faculty.washington.edu/smcohen/320/cats320.htm
Cohen, Marc, “Chapter 16. Predication, Ontology and Change”, in Prof. Cohen course notes, University of Washington.
Dendrinos, Μ. Concept predications and hierarchies in Platonic dialogues: A philosophical ontology presented in terms of a software ontology [to be published]
Dendrinos, M., Griva, A., (2021) Platonic Parmenides– Translation, Analysis and Comments, Zitros Publications, [in Greek]
Dendrinos, M., Griva, A., (2020) “The sixth hypothesis of platonic Parmenides: From the Neoplatonists and Marsilio Ficino to a new hermeneutical approach”, Journal Ελληνική Φιλοσοφική Επιθεώρηση (Greek Philosopphical Review), 111, 176-189 [in Greek]
Dendrinos, M., (2015 [2014]) “Organization of the concepts of the Platonic dialogue Parmenides into a software ontology”, 4th International Conference on Integrated Information (IC-ININFO-2014), Madrid, Spain, printed in AIP Conference Proceedings 1644, 161 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4907832
Dendrinos, M., (2013) “An interpretation of the Platonic Sophist under the view of the contemporary semantical relations”. Proceedings of the Conference "History of Information”. Law Library of the University of Athens, Ionian University. Athens [in Greek]
http://conferences.ionio.gr/infohist2013/presentations
Dendrinos, M., (2011) “An interpretation of Aristotelian Logic according to George Boole”, The 1st International Conference on Integrated Information (IC-ININFO-2011), Kos, Greece
Dendrinos, M., (2006) “Philosophical Views about Digital Information and Relational Schemata”, Library Philosophy and Practice (LPP) Journal, Vol. 9, No. 1, http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/89/
MacBride, Fraser, (2006) “Predicate Reference”, published in Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Language, edited by E. Lepore and B. Smith, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 22-74
McPartland, Keith E., (2009) Predication and Ontology in Aristotle’s Organon, Ph.D dissertation, Cornell University, Jan. 2009
Matthen, Mohan, (1983) “Greek Ontology and the 'Is' of Truth”, Phronesis, Vol. 28, Issue 2, pp. 113-135
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
All products on this site are released with a Creative Commons license (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5 IT) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/it/ With this license, Authors retain copyright and publishing rights without restrictions, but allow any user to share, copy, distribute, transmit, adapt and make commercial use of the work without needing to provide additional permission, provided appropriate attribution is made to the original author or source. By using this license, all Philosophical Readings’s articles meet all funder and institutional requirements for being considered Open Access. Philosophical Readings does not charge an article processing or submission fee.