Twilight of the Genealogy? Or a Genealogy of Twilight? Saving Nietzsche's Internalization Hypothesis from Naive Determinism
Abstract
The Internalization Hypothesis (I.H.), as expressed in GM II 16 of On the Genealogy of Morals, is the essential albeit under-theorized principle of Nietzsche’s psychology. In the following essay, I investigate the purpose I.H. serves concerning Nietzsche’s theory of drives as well as the Hypothesis’s epistemic warrant. I demonstrate that I.H. needs a Neo-Darwinian underpinning for two reasons: 1) to answer the Time-Crunch Problem of Transformation, and 2) in order to render it coherent with Nietzsche’s physiological determinism as articulated in Twilight of the Idols. My re-examination of I.H., then, serves to underwrite the Hypothesis on solid empirical footing. In addition, my analysis provides further evidence to think that Brian Leiter’s initial (but naïve) type-fact reading of Nietzsche’s philosophy of psychology is accurate, deterministic warts and all.
ReferencesAbbey, Ruth. Nietzsche’s Middle Work. New York Oxford University Press, 2000.
Ahad, Abdul. “Evolution without Lamarck’s Theory and its Use in the Darwinian Theories of Evolution” 2011 International Journal of Bio-resource and Stress Management, 2011, 2(3):363-368
Ahern, Daniel. Nietzsche as Cultural Physician. Pennsylvania State University Press, 1995.
Anderson, Lanier R. “What is a Nietzschean Self” in Christopher Janaway and Simon Roberston (eds). Nietzsche, Naturalism and Normativity. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press 2012, 202-235
Anderson, Lanier, R. “On the Nobility of Nietzsche’s Priests.” Nietzsche’s On the Genealogy of Morality: A Critical Guide. Ed. Simon May. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011, 24–55.
Beals, William. “Internationalization and Its Consequences.” Journal of Nietzsche Studies, Vol 44. No. 3 Autumn, 2013, 435-445.
Brown, Richard. “Nihilism: “Thus Speaks Physiology.” Nietzsche and the Rhetoric of Nihilism: Essays on Interpretation, Language and Politics. Ed(s). Tom Darby, Bela Egyed and Ben Jones. Ottawa: Carleton University Press, 1989, 133–144.
Brown, Richard. “Nietzsche: That Profound Physiologist”. Nietzsche and Science. Eds Gregory Moore and Thomas Brobjer. Aldershot: Ashgate Press, 2004, 51-71.
Clark, Maudemarie and Dudrick, David. The Soul of Nietzsche’s Beyond Good and Evil. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2012.
Conway, Daniel. On the Genealogy of Morals: A Reader’s Guide. Lanham: MD: Rowman and Littlefield Press, 2008.
Foucault, Michel. “Nietzsche, Genealogy, History.” Language, Counter-Memory, Practice, Ed. D. Bouchard. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press, 1977.
Hatab, Lawrence. Nietzsche’s On the Genealogy of Morals an Introduction. Cambridge Introductions to Key Philosophical Texts Series. Cambridge, U.K. Cambridge University Press, 2008.
Kant, Immanuel. The Critique of Pure Reason. Trans. Norman Kemp Smith. London: Palgrave-Macmillan, 2007.
Katsafanas, Paul. The Nietzschean Self: Moral Psychology, Agency and the Unconscious. New York: Oxford University Press, 2016.
Klein, Wayne. Nietzsche and the Promise of Philosophy. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1997.
Lamarck, Jean Baptiste Pierre Antoine. “On the Influence of Circumstances on the Actions and Habits of Animals, and that of the Actions and Habits of Living Bodies, as Causes Which Modify Their Organization.” The American Naturalist, 22, 1888, 960–972
Leiter, Brian. “The Paradox of Fatalism and Self-Creation in Nietzsche” Willing and Nothingness: Schopenhauer as Nietzsche’s Educator. Ed. Christopher Janaway. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998.
Leiter, Brian. Nietzsche on Morality. London: Routledge, 2002.
Leiter, Brian. “Nietzsche’s Theory of the Will.” Philosopher’s Imprint, Vol. 7 No. 7, 2007 1-15.
Leiter, Brian. Moral Psychology with Nietzsche. Oxford University Press, 2019.
Lightbody, Brian. Nietzsche’s Will to Power Naturalized, Translating the Human into Nature and Nature into the Human. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2017.
Lightbody, Brian. “Artificial and Unconscious Selection In Nietzsche’s Genealogy: Expectorating the Poisoned-Pill of Lamarckism.” Genealogy, 3, 31, 2019, 1-23.
Moore, Gregory. Nietzsche, Biology, Metaphor. New York Oxford University Press, 2002.
Morrisson, Iain. “Ascetic Slaves: Rereading Nietzsche's On the Genealogy of Morals.” Journal of Nietzsche Studies, Vol. 45, No. 3 Autumn 2014, 230-257.
Nietzsche, Friedrich. Beyond Good and Evil. Trans. Walter Kaufmann. New York: Vintage, 1966.
Nietzsche, Friedrich. The Gay Science. Trans. Walter Kaufmann. New York: Vintage, 1974.
Nietzsche, Friedrich. On the Genealogy of Morals, in Basic Writings of Nietzsche,.Trans. Walter Kaufmann, Ed. Peter Gay. New York: Random House, 2000.
Nietzsche, Friedrich. The Anti-Christ and Twilight of the Idols. Translated by R.J. Holingdale, London: Penguin Books, 1990.
Nietzsche, Friedrich. Werke: Kritische Gesamtausgabe. 22 vols. ed(s). Giorgio Colli
and Mazzino Montinari. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1967-84.
Poellner, Peter. Nietzsche and Metaphysics. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.
Reginster, Bernard. “Nietzsche on Resentiment and Valuation.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57.2 (1997): 281–305.
Richardson, John. Nietzsche’s New Darwinism. New York: Oxford University Press, 2004.
Ruse, Michael. “The Biological Sciences Can Act as a Ground for Ethics,” Contemporary Debates in the Philosophy of Biology. New York: Wiley-Blackwell 2010.
Schacht, Richard. “Nietzsche and Lamarckism,” Journal of Nietzsche Studies, Summer Vol. 44. No. 2 2013 264-281
Scott, James, C. Against the Grain: A Deep History of the Earliest States, (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2017.
Voegelin Eric. “Nietzsche, The Crisis and the War. The Journal of Politics, Vol. 6 No. 2 May, 1944, 177-212.
Wegner, Daniel. The Illusion of Conscious Will. Cambridge Mass: MIT Press, 2002.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
All products on this site are released with a Creative Commons license (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5 IT) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/it/ With this license, Authors retain copyright and publishing rights without restrictions, but allow any user to share, copy, distribute, transmit, adapt and make commercial use of the work without needing to provide additional permission, provided appropriate attribution is made to the original author or source. By using this license, all Philosophical Readings’s articles meet all funder and institutional requirements for being considered Open Access. Philosophical Readings does not charge an article processing or submission fee.